Is your signature neat and readable as your name or is it a less than legible marking that only you would recognize as your name? Those who study such things say that a person's signature is a key to understanding how that person wants to be seen by others or that it is a sign of how your see yourself in relation to others. For instance, a simple, readable signature means that the writer is down to earth, modest and unassuming. A large flamboyant signature may mean that the writer wants to be seen as more important than he/she is, or that he/she is trying to hide an inferiority complex. An illegible signature that could in no way be deciphered as the name it represents could mean many things including that the person tries to appear smart but won't listen to what others have to say or simply that the person is trying to impress others.
I have no expertise on the subject and don't necessarily agree with the above interpretations. I just don't know, but what made me wonder about it is that when I had a blog makeover done a couple of months ago the makeover included a signature at the end of each post......and there is now a signature at the end of each of my posts. It is a perfectly fine signature. It just isn't my signature and that has kind of bothered me. It's not that my signature is any better, but it's mine, and the one at the bottom of my posts isn't. Mine would be a little smaller, a little less round and it would slant a little more to the right. I know, I could just remove the signature, but because of all the HTML issues I had before the makeover I'm a little afraid to mess with anything, so I think it will stay there for now. So if you are going to form an opinion based on the signature at the end of my posts, please make the above mentioned adjustments in your mind first.
Do you have a unique signature? Do you form an opinion about a person from the way they sign their name?